This is a question that we get a lot from family and friend back in California.
[Note: None of these are complaints, just observations]
In todays edition of "How is Austin different?" we'll look at the roads.
You wouldn't think that roads could be that different, but they are. First off, all of the freeways/highways have frontage roads that run along side them. This is both a blessing and a curse. You can move pretty quickly with out having to get on the highway, but you may have to drive for 2 miles before you can make a U-turn. Then there are the people that are trying to exit the highway or get on the highway and they cross the 4 lanes of the frontage road in about 50 yards. It's a recipe for accidents, and I've already met two people at work that have been in serious accidents because of this.
Next, the roads aren't labeled very well. In Cali you come to expect large traffic poles with big green signs for the street names. In Austin you get small signs usually hidden behind a tree or a bush. This results in lots of missed turns.
Also, urban planning does not appear to have been at the forefront of the minds of the city planners in Austin. In California you can usually expect suburban area to be build on some sort of grid pattern sprouting off of freeways. In Austin, however, the city seems to have grown much more organically. It makes it much more difficult to get around unless you know where you are going ahead of time.
Lastly, are the drivers. I thought that California had some crazy drivers, but Austin beats them hands down. There are some CRAZY drivers in Austin. It's like driving isn't a form of transportation as much as it is some sort of combative exposition. Weaving in and out of lanes, cutting people off, crossing huge swaths of traffic. It's nuts.